Falsificationism and Research Programmes: Impact of Popper and Lakatos on Economic Methodology (4th edition)

Dominican University Journal of Humanities 4:150-166 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I set out to critically review the impact of Popperian falsificationism and Lakatosian methodology of scientific research programmes [MSRP] on economic methodology and philosophy of economics. The central thesis I maintain is that neither Popper's falsificationism nor Lakatos' MSRP offers [philosophy of] economics a proper condition for the reception or rejection of economic theories.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lakatos' modification of Popper's falsificationism.Mo Liu - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
Falsificationism Revisited.Mehmet Elgin - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:101-106.
Falsificationism Revisited.Mehmet Elgin - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:101-106.
From the method of proofs and refutations to the methodology of scientific research programmes.Gábor Forrai - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (2):161-175.
Zur Wissenschaftsphilosophie von Imre Lakatos.Hans Rott - 1994 - Philosophia Naturalis 31:25-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-13

Downloads
121 (#147,851)

6 months
70 (#68,657)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Owen E. Adimike
Università Pontificia Salesiana

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references