REVIEWS-Minimum propositional proof length is NP-hard to linearly approximate

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (2):301-301 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some remarks on lengths of propositional proofs.Samuel R. Buss - 1995 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 34 (6):377-394.
Reasoning processes in propositional logic.Claes Strannegård, Simon Ulfsbäcker, David Hedqvist & Tommy Gärling - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (3):283-314.
Pool resolution is NP-hard to recognize.Samuel R. Buss - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (8):793-798.
The complexity of propositional proofs.Nathan Segerlind - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):417-481.
On the complexity of Gödel's proof predicate.Yijia Chen & Jörg Flum - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (1):239-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-24

Downloads
15 (#938,320)

6 months
8 (#350,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references