The Insignificance of Choice

In David Chan (ed.), Moral Psychology Today: Essays on Value, Rational Choice, and the Will. Springer. pp. 110--75 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For some time, philosophers have sought a more satisfactory understanding of the mysteries of morality through a close analysis of its assumed kinship with practical rationality, via the psychological capacity of choice. It is the view in the present paper that no such understanding is possible by these means. The significance of morality has nothing to do with choice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-08

Downloads
44 (#361,254)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph S. Biehl
Gotham Philosophical Society

Citations of this work

Defining Normativity.Stephen Finlay - 2019 - In Toh Kevin, Plunkett David & Shapiro Scott (eds.), Dimensions of Normativity: New Essays on Metaethics and Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 62-104.
Recent work on normativity.Stephen Finlay - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):331-346.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references