Two theories of mind as an immaterial substance: Descartes and Leibniz

In Rebecca Copenhaver (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in the Early Modern and Modern Ages (The History of the Philosophy of Mind, Band 4) (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes' Arguments for the Mind–Body Distinction.Dale Jacquette - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 290–296.
Against Cartesian Dualism.Jaegwon Kim - 2018 - In Jonathan J. Loose, Angus John Louis Menuge & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 152–167.
17th Century Theories of Substance.Thaddeus S. Robinson - 2011 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1 (1):1.
Cartesian Selves and Lockean Substances.Edwin McCann - 1986 - The Monist 69 (3):458-482.
A Comparison Between Avicennian Dualism and Cartesian Dualism.Aykut Alper Yilmaz - 2021 - Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi 25 (1):173-194.
The Substance-attributes Relationship in Cartesian Dualism.Françoise Monnoyeur - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Research 43:177-189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-31

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references