Religious Studies 34 (2):205-217 (1998)
|Abstract||The problem of infant suffering and death is one of the most difficult versions of the problem of evil, especially when one considers how God can be thought good to the infant victims by the infant victims. In the first portion of this paper, I examine two theodicies that aim to solve this problem but (I argue) fail. In the final section, I suggest that the problem is better handled by maintaining not that God must redeem the suffering of such children, but that such children are not the sort of beings whose suffering a good God can or should redeem.|
|Keywords||evil infants theodicy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bradley Monton (2010). Against Multiverse Theodicies. Philo 13 (2):113-135.
Andrea M. Weisberger (2007). The Argument From Evil. In Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge.
Whitley R. P. Kaufman (2005). Karma, Rebirth, and the Problem of Evil. Philosophy East and West 55 (1):15-32.
Lars Fr H. Svendsen (2010). A Philosophy of Evil. Dalkey Archive Press.
Peter Van Inwagen (2006). The Problem of Evil: The Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of St. Andrews in 2003. Oxford University Press.
James R. Beebe, Logical Problem of Evil. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nathan Nobis (2001). ‘Balancing Out’ Infant Torture and Death: A Reply to Chignell. Religious Studies 37 (1):103-108.
David Basinger (1999). Infant Suffering: A Response to Chignell. Religious Studies 35 (3):363-369.
Nathan Nobis (2002). The Real Problem of Infant and Animal Suffering. Philo 5 (2):216-225.
Andrew Chignell (2001). Infant Suffering Revisited. Religious Studies 37 (4):475-484.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads97 ( #8,350 of 722,919 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,864 of 722,919 )
How can I increase my downloads?