Reply to Ohanian's comment

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):218-219 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.01.002

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.
Did Einstein prove E=mc2?Hans C. Ohanian - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):167-173.
A comment on Hochberg's reply to Storer.David Karl Kauf - 1954 - Philosophical Studies 5 (4):57 - 58.
Comment on Professor Mackay's Reply.C. J. F. Williams - 1960 - Analysis 21 (4):84 - 85.
A Reply to Professor Flew's Comment.J. W. N. Watkins - 1957 - Analysis 18 (2):41 - 42.
Reply to denora's comment.Daniel F. Chambliss - 1992 - Sociological Theory 10 (1):103-105.
Reply to Editorial Comment.John Elof Boodin - 1911 - The Monist 21 (2):295-296.
Saunders and Wallace reply.Simon Saunders & David Wallace - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):315-317.
On Law and Utopia: Rules vs. Principles? — A Comment on Ramiro Avilés's Reply.Shulamit Almog & Amnon Reichman - 2003 - Utopian Studies 14 (1):143 - 148.
I. rising up from downunder: Comments on Feyerabend's 'marxist fairytales from australia'.W. Suchting - 1978 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):337 – 347.
Normative marketing ethics redux, incorporating a reply to Smith.John F. Gaski - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 32 (1):19 - 34.
State or process requirements?John Gardner - manuscript
Pro-Latour.Karen François - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (2):337-342.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-14

Downloads
58 (#271,353)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Did Einstein prove E=mc2?Hans C. Ohanian - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):167-173.
A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.
A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.

Add more references