Purity Balls

Stance 9 (1):73-83 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I draw on the principles of Aristotelian ethics, the work of modern virtue ethicists, and previous feminist critiques of purity balls to interrogate the effects of this practice on moral development. I argue that purity balls discourage young women from making autonomous, informed, and virtuously motivated decisions regarding their sexuality. While most critiques of purity balls are rooted in the explicitly patriarchal structure of these events, my analysis emphasizes the negative impact they have on moral agency. I conclude that purity balls are unethical because of the detrimental effects they have on the becoming of virtuous agents.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Purity as an ideal of proof.Michael Detlefsen - 2008 - In Paolo Mancosu (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford University Press. pp. 179-197.
Nietzsche: Through the Lens of Purity.Robbie Duschinsky - 2011 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 41 (1):50-64.
Purity of Methods.Michael Detlefsen & Andrew Arana - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11.
A relativistic Zeno effect.David Atkinson - 2008 - Synthese 160 (1):5 - 12.
Elevation of the eye-balls on winking.W. R. Miles - 1931 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 14 (4):311.
Purity (Benjamin with Kant).Carlo Salzani - 2010 - History of European Ideas 36 (4):438-447.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
25 (#633,195)

6 months
7 (#430,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references