Arguing Around Mathematical Proofs

In Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 61-76 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

More or less explicitly inspired by the Aristotelian classification of arguments, a wide tradition makes a sharp distinction between argument and proof. Ch. Perelman and R. Johnson, among others, share this view based on the principle that the conclusion of an argument is uncertain while the conclusion of a proof is certain. Producing proof is certainly a major part of mathematical activity. Yet, in practice, mathematicians, expert or beginner, argue about mathematical proofs. This happens during the search for a proof, then when the proof is presented and discussed by experts, and finally when it is taught or used in didactical contexts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
14 (#971,788)

6 months
4 (#793,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michel Dufour
Université Sorbonne-Nouvelle

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references