Justifying non-violent resistance: The perspectives of healthcare workers

Clinical Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Introduction: Non-violent resistance, carried out by healthcare workers, has been a common phenomenon. Despite this and despite the issues this type of action raises, we know little about the healthcare workers who engage in this action and their perspectives about its justification. This exploratory study sought to address this gap, examining these fundamental questions amongst a sample of healthcare workers who have engaged in acts of resistance, exploring their understanding of non-violent resistance, its justification and the barriers they faced in engaging in such action. Methods: Participants were recruited through Medact's ( https://www.medact.org/ ) member database and directed to an online survey hosted on Qualtrics. While participants were unlikely to be representative of the broader UK healthcare community, participants were in an advantageous position to comment on non-violent resistance. Descriptive quantitative analysis and a content analysis were conducted. Results: The majority of participants felt that non-violent resistance could be justified dependent on its cause and/or the action in question. Within this, most felt that if action were non-violent, that if it didn't harm patients and that if the issue in question had to do with health being compromised, action was often justified. A number of others framed their justification as being a right or duty to engage in non-violent resistance. In relation to barriers to engaging in non-violent resistance, these fell into three categories: personal, professional and broader concerns related to society or the general culture found in healthcare. Within these, time and concerns about registration or the consequences of engaging in action were cited as the greatest barriers. Conclusions: These results suggest that healthcare workers who regularly engage in non-violent action carefully thought through their actions, acknowledging the diversity of actions and issues that could be challenged, for many patient care remained a primary concern. There is a need for clarity from regulatory bodies and in particular the need for dialogue between healthcare bodies and healthcare workers who continue to engage in acts of non-violent resistance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Resistance in health and healthcare.Ryan Essex - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (5):480-486.
The Role of Social Work in the Provision of Healthcare in Africa.Mavis Dako-Gyeke, Doris A. Boateng & Abigail A. Mills - 2018 - In Nico Nortjé, Jo-Celene De Jongh & Willem A. Hoffmann (eds.), African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare Professionals. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 107-118.
Violent Resistance as Radical Choice.Tamara Fakhoury - 2023 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 9 (1).
Of Healthcare Professionals, Ethics, and Strikes.Erich H. Loewy - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (4):513-520.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-12

Downloads
8 (#1,316,752)

6 months
5 (#637,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?