On the Choice of Algebra for Quantization

Philosophy of Science 85 (1):102-125 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I examine the relationship between physical quantities and physical states in quantum theories. I argue against the claim made by Arageorgis that the approach to interpreting quantum theories known as Algebraic Imperialism allows for “too many states.” I prove a result establishing that the Algebraic Imperialist has very general resources that she can employ to change her abstract algebra of quantities in order to rule out unphysical states.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quantum measurement and algebraic quantum field theories.B. DeFacio - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (2):185-192.
Classical foundations of quantum groups.Christian Fronsdal - 1993 - Foundations of Physics 23 (4):551-569.
Algebraic description of the quantum defect.R. Gilmore, H. G. Solari & S. K. Kim - 1993 - Foundations of Physics 23 (6):873-879.
Medieval Arabic Algebra as an Artificial Language.Jeffrey A. Oaks - 2007 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (5-6):543-575.
Effect Algebras Are Not Adequate Models for Quantum Mechanics.Stan Gudder - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1566-1577.
BRST Extension of Geometric Quantization.Ronald Fulp - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (1):103-124.
Toward an Understanding of Parochial Observables.Benjamin Feintzeig - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw010.
On the logical origins of quantum mechanics demonstrated by using Clifford algebra.Elio Conte - 2011 - Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics 8 (25):109-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-10

Downloads
39 (#405,676)

6 months
5 (#627,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin Feintzeig
University of Washington

Citations of this work

The Coalescence Approach to Inequivalent Representation: Pre-QM ∞ Parallels.Caspar Jacobs - 2023 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 74 (4):1069-1090.
The Classical Limit as an Approximation.Benjamin H. Feintzeig - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (4):612-639.
Why be regular? Part II.Benjamin Feintzeig & James Owen Weatherall - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 65 (C):133-144.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Interpreting Quantum Theories: The Art of the Possible.Laura Ruetsche - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Between classical and quantum.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2007 - Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 2:417--553.
Are Rindler Quanta Real? Inequivalent Particle Concepts in Quantum Field Theory.Rob Clifton & Hans Halvorson - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):417-470.
Algebraic quantum field theory.Hans Halvorson & Michael Mueger - 2006 - In J. Butterfield & J. Earman (eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of physics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Interpreting quantum field theory.Laura Ruetsche - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):348-378.

View all 14 references / Add more references