Defending a Benefit-Based Approach to Compensation for Necessary Losses

Stance 8:39-45 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines cases when compensation follows from necessary actions that cause harm. I posit that we can determine when compensation is due in instances of necessity by referring to the distribution of benefits and losses that result from the action.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The counterfactual conception of compensation.Rodney C. Roberts - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (3-4):414–428.
The Spirit of Humanities.Henning Ottmann - 2010 - Synthesis Philosophica 25 (1):101-107.
The Endangered Species Act, Regulatory Takings, and Public Goods.N. Scott Arnold - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2):353-377.
A Difficulty Concerning Compensation.Saul Smilansky - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (3):329-337.
Rights to Compensation.Onora O'Neill - 1987 - Social Philosophy and Policy 5 (1):72.
Voluntary losses and wage compensation.Simon Wigley - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):363-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
4 (#1,628,455)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references