An I3 Theory analysis of human sex differences in aggression

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):279-279 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to I3 Theory, individuals enact aggressive behaviors when (a) instigating triggers are severe, (b) impelling forces are strong, and/or (c) inhibiting forces are weak. Archer's analysis of human sex differences in aggression could be bolstered by a careful analysis of male-female discrepancies in reactivity (or exposure) to instigating triggers, proneness toward impelling forces, and/or proneness toward inhibiting forces

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some reflections on sex differences in aggression and violence.Stephen C. Maxson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):232-233.
Theories of male and female aggression.Kirsti M. J. Lagerspetz - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):229-230.
Psychobiology of conflict.Mauro Maldonato - 2006 - World Futures 62 (5):392 – 400.
Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?John Archer - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):249-266.
Risk-taking, fear, dominance, and testosterone.John Archer - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):214-215.
Primacy of organising effects of testosterone.Anne Campbell, Steven Muncer & Josie Odber - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):365-365.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
44 (#359,559)

6 months
3 (#962,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references