Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis)
Synthese 28 (2):97-115 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert M. French & Elizabeth Thomas (1998). The Dynamical Hypothesis: One Battle Behind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):640-641.
Alexander Rosenberg (1994). Instrumental Biology, or, the Disunity of Science. University of Chicago Press.
Barry Loewer (2009). Why is There Anything Except Physics? Synthese 170 (2):217 - 233.
Mathias Frisch (2011). From Arbuthnot to Boltzmann: The Past Hypothesis, the Best System, and the Special Sciences. Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1001-1011.
Jennifer Radden (2003). Learning From Disunity. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (4):357-359.
Alexander Reutlinger (2011). A Theory of Non-Universal Laws. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):97 - 117.
Terence Horgan & John Tienson (1998). Resisting the Tyranny of Terminology: The General Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):643-643.
Alison Wylie (1999). Rethinking Unity as a "Working Hypothesis" for Philosophy: How Archaeologists Exploit the Disunities of Science. Perspectives on Science 7 (3):293-317.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads129 ( #3,603 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,333 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
