to show the relative consistency of Cantor's Continuum Hypothesis. L is defined as a union L=⋃

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):453-468 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present here an approach to the fine structure of L based solely on elementary model theoretic ideas, and illustrate its use in a proof of Global Square in L. We thereby avoid the Lévy hierarchy of formulas and the subtleties of master codes and projecta, introduced by Jensen [3] in the original form of the theory. Our theory could appropriately be called ”Hyperfine Structure Theory”, as we make use of a hierarchy of structures and hull operations which refines the traditional Lα -or Jα-sequences with their Σn-hull operations.§1. Introduction. In 1938, K. Gödel defined the model L of set theory to show the relative consistency of Cantor's Continuum Hypothesis. L is defined as a unionof initial segments which satisfy: L0 = ∅, Lλ = ∪α<λLα for limit ordinals λ, and, crucially, Lα + 1 = the collection of 1st order definable subsets of Lα. Since every transitive model of set theory must be closed under 1st order definability, L turns out to be the smallest inner model of set theory. Thus it occupies the central place in the set theoretic spectrum of models.The proof of the continuum hypothesis in L is based on the very uniform hierarchical definition of the L-hierarchy. The Condensation Lemma states that if π : M → Lα is an elementary embedding, M transitive, then some ; the lemma can be proved by induction on α. If a real, i.e., a subset of ω, is definable over some Lα,then by a Löwenheim-Skolem argument it is definable over some countable M as above, and hence over some, < ω1. This allows one to list the reals in L in length ω1 and therefore proves the Continuum Hypothesis in L.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Cantor's continuum problem inherently vague?Kai Hauser - 2002 - Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):257-285.
On the axiom of union.Greg Oman - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (3):283-289.
The Consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis.Kurt Godel - 1940 - Princeton University Press.
The consistency of the continuum hypothesis via synergistic models.Alexander Abian - 1973 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 19 (13):193-198.
Turing determinacy and the continuum hypothesis.Ramez L. Sami - 1989 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 28 (3):149-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
20 (#749,846)

6 months
17 (#142,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Square below a non-weakly compact cardinal.Hazel Brickhill - 2020 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (3-4):409-426.
Global square and mutual stationarity at the ℵn.Peter Koepke & Philip D. Welch - 2011 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (10):787-806.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references