Review of Alan Richardson, Thomas Uebel (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (5) (2008)
For much of the second half of the 20th Century, the primary role logical empiricism played was that of the argumentative foil. The 'received view' on a given topic (especially in philosophy of science, logic, or language) was frequently identified with some supposedly dogmatic tenet of logical empiricism. However, during the last twenty-five years, scholars have paid serious, sustained attention to what the logical positivists, individually and collectively, actually said. Early scholarship on logical empiricism had to engage in heavy-duty PR work: why should anyone study the now-discarded mixture of blunders and implausibilities collected under the label 'logical empiricism'? However, thanks to the efforts of the pioneers, people studying the logical empiricists today need not articulate an extended apologia for their chosen subject of study -- rather, they can simply get on with their work. Many of the best fruits of these recent labors are on display in The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism (CCLE), edited by Alan Richardson and Thomas Uebel.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Greg Frost-Arnold (2011). Putting the 'Empiricism' in 'Logical Empiricism': The Director's Cut. [REVIEW] Metascience 20 (2):373-376.
Matti Eklund (2000). The Aims of Logical Empiricism As a Philosophy of Science. Acta Analytica 15 (25):137-59.
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2005). Review of Gary L. Hardcastle & Alan W. Richardson (Eds.), Logical Empiricism in North America. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 72 (4):153-155.
Kathleen Okruhlik (2004). Logical Empiricism, Feminism, and Neurath's Auxiliary Motive. Hypatia 19 (1):48-72.
Alan W. Richardson & Thomas E. Uebel (2005). The Epistemic Agent in Logical Positivism. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79:73-105.
Richard Creath (1995). Are Dinosaurs Extinct? Foundations of Science 1 (2):285-297.
Gabriella Crocco (2000). Alan W. Richardson, Carnap's Construction of the World. The Logical Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism. Erkenntnis 52 (1):127-131.
Thomas Mormann (2007). The Structure of Scientific Theories in Logical Empiricism. In A. Richardson & T. Uebel (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. CUP
Thomas E. Uebel & Alan W. Richardson (eds.) (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #232,664 of 1,792,039 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,591 of 1,792,039 )
How can I increase my downloads?