Science and finnish sociology: Reply to allardt and Kelle

&
Social Epistemology 2 (4):353 – 355 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/02691728808578504

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reviving the sociology of science.Philip Kitcher - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):44.
On the circulation and legitimation of social science knowledge: The case of finnish sociology.Ellsworth Fuhrman & Erkki Kaukonen - 1988 - Social Epistemology 2 (1):43 – 59.
Comment on Fuhrman and kaukonen.Erik Allardt - 1988 - Social Epistemology 2 (1):61 – 66.
Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science.Craig Calhoun (ed.) - 2010 - Columbia University Press.
The uncertain science: criticism of sociological formalism.Ahmed Gurnah - 1992 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Alan Scott.
Finnish studies in seventeenth-century rationalism.Olli Koistinen - 2003 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80 (1):371-389.
Finnish studies in the history of ancient and mediaeval philosophy.Mikko Yrjönsuuri - 2003 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80 (1):357-369.
Sociology studies itself: Reply to Fuhrman and kaukonen.Vladimir Kelle - 1988 - Social Epistemology 2 (2):175 – 179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-01

Downloads
27 (#583,858)

6 months
4 (#783,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references