Aufbau / Bauhaus : positivisme logique et modernisme architectural

Cahiers Philosophiques 161 (2):96-127 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper, originally published some thirty years ago, offers different views on Carnap, and more generally on the Vienna Circle, than the accounts that had been hitherto given. There the Author also shares a new approach to the philosophy of science, which has made him one of the most distinguished epistemologists of his generation. Such a view is based on a new attention given both to scientific practices, not only theories, and to their socio-historical contexts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revisiting Galison’s ‘Aufbau/Bauhaus’ in light of Neurath’s philosophical projects.Angela Potochnik & Audrey Yap - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (3):469-488.
Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logischer Positivismus und architektonischer Modernismus.Peter Galison - 1995 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 43 (4):653-686.
Aufbau and bauhaus: A cross-realm comparison.Lucian Krukowski - 1992 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50 (3):197-209.
Josef Albers. "So ist Kunst ... Erlebnis".Martina Sauer - 2018 - Wiesbaden, Germany: Weimarer Verlagsgesellschaft.
Le défi du positivisme logique.É Winance - 1981 - Revue Thomiste 81:533.
La Philosophie de K. Popper et le Positivisme Logique.J. Malherbe - 1980 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 85 (4):547-547.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-09

Downloads
7 (#1,369,174)

6 months
4 (#790,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references