Dating, the Ethics of Competition, and Heath’s Market Failures Approach

Business Ethics Journal Review 6 (9):47-53 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “The Responsibilities and Role of Business in Relation to Society,” Nien-hê Hsieh challenges Joseph Heath’s “market failure” or Paretian approach to business ethics by arguing for a “Back to Basics” approach. Here, I argue that two basics of Hsieh’s three-basics vision are flawed, because a. ordinary morality is in fact not sufficient for the adversarial realm of the market, and b. the ideal of a Pareto-optimal market economy with perfect competition does in fact provide an adequate basis for normative rules against market failures.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Professionalism, Agency, and Market Failures.Hasko von Kriegstein - 2016 - Business Ethics Quarterly 26 (4):445-464.
Competition, Value Creation and the Self-Understanding of Business.David Silver - 2016 - Business Ethics Journal Review 4 (10):59-65.
About the Ethics of Business Competition.Matti Estola - 1998 - Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 3 (1).
Efficiency and Ethically Responsible Management.Jeffery Smith - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 150 (3):603-618.
On the Market Rule and Related Institutional Arrangement.Yin-Xing Hong - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):5-11.
La moralité implicite du marché.Pierre-Yves Néron - 2010 - Les Ateliers de L’Ethique 5 (1):4-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-14

Downloads
49 (#320,021)

6 months
9 (#295,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Gustafson
Creighton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations