Determining death by neurological criteria: current practice and ethics

Philadelphia, PA: National Catholic Bioethics Center (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The neurological criteria for the determination of death remain controversial within secular and Catholic circles, even though they are widely accepted within the medical community. In Determining Death by Neurological Criteria, Matthew Hanley offers both a practical and a philosophical defense. Hanley shows that the criteria are often misapplied in clinical settings, leading to cases where persons declared dead apparently spontaneously revive. These instances are often connected to a rushed decision to retrieve donated organs, thus undermining the trust of the public in organ donation. Hanley calls on health care institutions to take seriously their obligation to establish strict protocols for the determination of death, including who may conduct the examinations. From a broader perspective, Hanley considers how the criteria rely on a philosophical conception of the person as a living organism whose unity disintegrates at death. This view, he notes, corresponds to the Catholic conviction that the soul is the life-principle of the body, which departs at death, bringing about the destruction of the body-soul composite. The Vatican, recognizing that death is a medical judgment, has generally given its approval to the criteria. Hanley also reviews the many and various objections offered by detractors, including against the use of the apnea test, which is faulted as a practice that sometimes hastens death. The problem of the continued presence of certain vital functions within the deceased body of the brain dead is explored in detail, with reference to particular cases and to solutions proposed by leading physicians and bioethicists. Hanley likewise addresses the dilemma of having two separate standards for death, one neurological and the other cardiopulmonary. Given the possibility of resuscitation following loss of the cardio-circulatory system, he concludes that the neurological criteria must be the true standard. Stoppage of the heart leads swiftly to the final necrosis of the brain. -- Provided by publisher.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical issues in death and dying.Robert F. Weir (ed.) - 1977 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Death, Brain Death, and Ethics.David Lamb - 1985 - State University of New York Press.
Brain Death and Brainstem Death: Philosophical and Ethical Considerations.David Lamb - 1987 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 22:231-249.
Contemporary Medicalization and the Ethics of Death and Dying.Asmat Ara Islam - 2021 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 12 (2):29-36.
Decapitation and the definition of death.F. G. Miller & R. D. Truog - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (10):632-634.
Separating Death from Mind and Morals.Michael Lavin - 1989 - Public Affairs Quarterly 3 (3):35-47.
The Ethics of Organ Donation after Cardiac Death.Matthew T. Warnez - 2020 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (4):745-758.
The challenge of death and ethics of social consequences: Death of moral agency.Ján Kalajtzidis - 2018 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 8 (3-4):209-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-02

Downloads
12 (#1,075,977)

6 months
8 (#350,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references