Letter identification errors as a function of retinal input locus and positional variability

&
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 11 (4):209-211 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03336810

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Perception of letter arrays as a function of absolute retinal locus.Maurice Hershenson - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):201.
Word recognition as a function of retinal locus.Mortimer Mishkin & Donald G. Forgays - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (1):43.
Retinal determination genes function along with cell-cell signals to regulate Drosophila eye development.Nicholas E. Baker & Lucy C. Firth - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (7):538-546.
Concept identification as a function of intra- and interdimensional variability.William F. Battig & Lyle E. Bourne - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):329.
Signal detection approach to the study of retinal locus in tachistoscopic recognition.Wilma A. Winnick & Gerard E. Bruder - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (3p1):528.
Position-invariant letter identification is a key component of any universal model of reading.Jeffrey S. Bowers - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):281-282.
Binocular-rivalry as a function of retinal locus and eye dominance.S. Coren & C. Porac - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (6):487-487.
Listeners' perceptual mapping of locus equations and variability.Krishna Govindarajan - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):266-267.
The effects of retinal locus and attention on the perception of words.Herbert S. Terrace - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):382.
Effects of wavelength and retinal locus on the reaction time to onset and offset stimulation.Neil R. Bartlett, Thomas G. Sticht & Victor P. Pease - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):699.
Concept identification as a function of intradimensional variability, availability of previously presented material, and relative frequency of relevant attributes.James Chumbley, Portia Lau, Dennis Rog & George Haile - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):163.
Genetic and clinical heterogeneity in tapetal retinal dystrophies.A. A. B. Bergen - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):470-471.
Intradimensional variability and concept identification.Robert C. Haygood, Terry L. Harbert & Jane A. Omlor - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):216.
Another variety of vision.John R. Skoyles - 1997 - Trends in Neurosciences 20 (1):22-23.
Counting repeated light flashes as a function of their number, their rate of presentation, and retinal location stimulated.D. M. Forsyth & A. Chapanis - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (5):385.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
20 (#766,692)

6 months
4 (#787,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references