Edge-of-the-Field Ethics Consulting: What Are We Missing?

Journal of Clinical Ethics 29 (2):81-92 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ethics consultants’ grasp of ethical principles is ever improving. Yet, what still remains and will remain lacking is their ability to access factors that lie outside their conscious awareness and thus still effect suboptimal outcomes. This article will explore several ways in which these poor outcomes may occur. This discussion will include clinicians’ implicit biases, well-intentioned but nonetheless intrusive violations of patients’ privacy, and clinicians’ unwittingly connoting to patients and families that clinicians regard their moral values and conclusions as superior. I shall suggest several ways in which clinicians may seek to reduce these sources of bad outcomes or at least to do better when they occur.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liability of Ethics Consultants: A Case Analysis.Gordon DuVal - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (3):269-281.
Applying Applied Ethics through Ethics Consulting in Bioethics.Willem Moore - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:69-74.
Truisms in Business Ethics.Stephen Cohen - 1999 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 18 (3-4):47-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-14

Downloads
7 (#1,405,055)

6 months
4 (#846,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

E. Howe
San Diego State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references