Objective vs. subjective scales: the challenge that the scale type poses to the JUDGEMAP model of context sensitive judgment

In D. C. Richardson B. Kokinov (ed.), Modeling and Using Context. Springer. pp. 263--276 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Objective and Subjective 'Ought'.Ralph Wedgwood - 2016 - In Nate Charlow & Matthew Chrisman (eds.), Deontic Modality. Oxford University Press. pp. 143-168.
Objective and cognitive context.Carlo Penco - 1999 - In P. Brezillon & P. Bouquet (eds.), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer.
Information integration in risky decision making.Norman H. Anderson & James C. Shanteau - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):441.
Objective or subjective 'ought'?Sven Ove Hansson - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (1):33-35.
A model for a very good scale and a bad scale.Dima Sinapova - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1361-1372.
Further as to valuation as judgment.John Dewey - 1943 - Journal of Philosophy 40 (20):543-552.
Subjective and objective.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 207-222.
Nagel on subjective and objective.V. Haksar - 1981 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 24 (March):105-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
31 (#510,914)

6 months
4 (#783,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Category judgment: A range-frequency model.Allen Parducci - 1965 - Psychological Review 72 (6):407-418.

Add more references