Some New Infinity Puzzles

Philosophia 48 (3):1093-1099 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Salmon was the first to speak explicitly of paradoxes of kinematics. In this short note I introduce a new class of infinity puzzles. Following natural terminology, they should actually be called static paradoxes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Flawed Argument Against Actual Infinity in Physics.Jon Perez Laraudogoitia - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (12):1902-1910.
Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity.Graham Oppy - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Science, Religion, and Infinity.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In J. B. Stump & Alan G. Padgett (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 430-440.
Some Considerations on Infinity in Physics.Carlo Rovelli - 2011 - In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: new research frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-01

Downloads
36 (#440,811)

6 months
3 (#962,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jon Perez Laraudogoitia
University of the Basque Country

Citations of this work

A New Contact Paradox.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - forthcoming - Foundations of Science:1-18.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Zeno’s Paradoxes.Wesley Charles Salmon (ed.) - 1970 - Indianapolis, IN, USA: Bobbs-Merrill.

Add more references