The gene and the sign: giving structure to postmodernity

Semiotica 62 (3/4) (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Action in signs.Andres Luure - 2009 - Sign Systems Studies 37 (1/2):270-280.
Genes in the postgenomic era.Paul E. Griffiths & Karola Stotz - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):499-521.
Baudrillard’s simulated ecology.Jonathan Beever - 2013 - Sign Systems Studies 41 (1):82-92.
Postmodernity's transcending: devaluing God.Laurence Paul Hemming - 2005 - Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Historical development of the concept of the Gene.Petter Portin - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (3):257 – 286.
Are genes units of inheritance?Thomas Fogle - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):349-371.
What's left of Enlightenment?: a postmodern question.Keith Michael Baker & Peter Hanns Reill (eds.) - 2001 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
The Chromosome Theory of Mendelian Inheritance: Explanation and Realism in Theory Construction.Marga Vicedo - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:179 - 191.
Tegn som Språk.Sissel Redse Jørgensen & Rani Lill Anjum (eds.) - 2006 - Gyldendal Akademisk.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references