Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning
Graduate studies at Western
Oxford University Press (2005)
|Abstract||This book discusses theories of legal reasoning and provides an overall view of the rhetoric of legal justification. It shows how and why lawyers arguments can be rationally persuasive even though rarely, if ever, logically conclusive or compelling. It examines the role of "legal syllogism" and universality of legal reasoning, looking at arguments of consequentialism and principle, and concludes by questioning the infallibility of judges as lawmakers.|
|Keywords||Law Methodology Law Philosophy Rule of law|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$35.85 new (21% off) $37.96 used (16% off) $38.26 direct from Amazon (15% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||K213.M284 2005|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Colleen Murphy (2005). Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law. Law and Philosophy 24 (3):239-262.
James Lee (2010). MacCormick's Jurisprudence Determined. Jurisprudence 1 (1):105-119.
Scott Shapiro (2011). Legality. Harvard University Press.
James R. Maxeiner, The Rules of Law in the Reform of Legal Education: Teaching the Legal Mind in Japanese Law Schools.
Theodore M. Benditt (1978). Law as Rule and Principle: Problems of Legal Philosophy. Stanford University Press.
David T. Ritchie (2008). Mastering Legal Analysis and Communication. Carolina Academic Press.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
F. Atria (1999). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited. Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?