Desiderio e libertà: risposte ai miei critici

Etica E Politica 15 (1):358-363 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that the two commentators, moving from different disciplinary backgrounds, deepen the comprehension of techo-nihilism and its relationships with contemporary social theory. From a philosophical point of view, P. Gomarasca offers a remarkable contribution in clarifying similarities and differences with respect to G.Deleuze's position, while Porta recovers two notions forgotten by the economic theory such as brotherhood and gift

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Risposte ai miei critici.Maurizio Ferraris - 2012 - Rivista di Estetica 50:391-409.
Risposte ai miei critici.Francesco Botturi - 2010 - Etica E Politica 12 (1):349-359.
Risposte ai miei critici.Adriano Fabris - 2011 - Etica E Politica 13 (1):345-352.
Risposte ai miei critici.Pedroni Virginio - 2010 - Etica E Politica 12 (2):278-291.
Risposta ai miei critici.Stelio Zeppi - 2004 - Etica E Politica 6 (2):1.
Magatti Mauro, Libertà immaginaria. Le illusioni del capitalismo tecno-nichilista.F. Giacomantonio - 2011 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 88 (3):449.
I Fallimenti Della Libertà.Pier Porta - 2013 - Etica E Politica 15 (1):349-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references