What’s Responsible for the Retraction Boom?

&
In Farina Madita Dobrick, Jana Fischer & Lutz M. Hagen (eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age: Ethics for the Social Sciences and Humanities in Times of Mediatization and Digitization. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 23-28 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss whether the seeming increase in the amount of misconduct in science is a real phenomenon, and how the structures and processes of scientific publishing, as well as of the scientific community, may contribute to this.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_3

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Empirical developments in retraction.B. K. Redman, H. N. Yarandi & J. F. Merz - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):807-809.
The Retraction Watch retraction: how bad advice became worse advice for scientists and academics.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2017 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 27 (4):135-140.
The Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks.Charisse R. Madlock-Brown & David Eichmann - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):127-137.
Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct.Anne Victoria Neale, Justin Northrup, Rhonda Dailey, Ellen Marks & Judith Abrams - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):5-24.
Responsible conduct in research.P. J. D. Drenth - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):13-21.
Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.E. Wager & P. Williams - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (9):567-570.
The Dynamics of Retraction in Epistemic Networks.Travis LaCroix, Anders Geil & Cailin O’Connor - 2021 - Philosophy of Science 88 (3):415-438.
Retractions in Science.Wray K. Brad & Andersen Line Edslev - forthcoming - Scientometrics.
Retraction: The “Other Face” of Research Collaboration?Li Tang, Guangyuan Hu, Yang Sui, Yuhan Yang & Cong Cao - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1681-1708.
Detecting Errors that Result in Retractions.Line Edslev Andersen & K. Brad Wray - 2019 - Social Studies of Science 46 (6):942-954.
World Map of Scientific Misconduct.Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1653-1656.
Mad Scientist: The Unique Case of a Published Delusion.Matan Shelomi - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):381-388.
Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?R. Grant Steen - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (4):249-253.
Radical Relativism, Retraction and 'Being at Fault'.FIlippo Ferarri & Dan Zeman - 2014 - In Fabio Bacchini, Stefano Caputo & Massimo Dell'Utri (eds.), New Frontiers in Truth. Cambridge Scholar. pp. 80-102.
Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings.David B. Resnik & Gregg E. Dinse - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (1):46-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
1 (#1,909,996)

6 months
1 (#1,507,819)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references