When is arithmetic possible?

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 50 (1):29-51 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When a structure or class of structures admits an unbounded induction, we can do arithmetic on the stages of that induction: if only bounded inductions are admitted, then clearly each inductively definable relation can be defined using a finite explicit expression. Is the converse true? We examine evidence that the converse is true, in positive elementary induction . We present a stronger conjecture involving the language L consisting of all L∞ω formulas with a finite number of variables, and examine a combinatorial property equivalent to “all L-definable relations are elementary”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
12 (#1,077,002)

6 months
3 (#968,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How to define a linear order on finite models.Lauri Hella, Phokion G. Kolaitis & Kerkko Luosto - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 87 (3):241-267.
Guarded quantification in least fixed point logic.Gregory McColm - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (1):61-110.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Moschovakis closure ordinals.Jon Barwise - 1977 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (2):292-296.
On the Computational Complexity of Algorithms.J. Hartmanis & R. E. Stearns - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (1):120-121.
Upper and Lower Bounds for First Order Expressibility.Neil Immerman - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):287-288.

Add more references