The Ethics of COVID-19 Vaccine Passports

Ethics and Medics 46 (4):1-2 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccine passports run the risk of creating a divided society where social privileges or restrictions based on “fitness” lead to discrimination based on immunization status. Individuals have a strong right to be free of coercion to take a COVID-19 vaccine, and we should be very leery of further invasion of private medical decisions. These concerns are shared both internationally and in the United States, and the World Health Organization, the Biden administration, and many US governors oppose COVID-19 vaccine credentials. In addition, regulations for COVID-19 vaccine credentials face practical barriers, including lack of access globally, especially among the poor; and lack of scientific data on the efficacy of these vaccines.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Austriaco on Vaccine Passports.Joseph Meaney - 2021 - Ethics and Medics 46 (4):4-4.
Vaccine passports and health disparities: a perilous journey.Nancy S. Jecker - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (12):957-960.
Ethical allocation of future COVID-19 vaccines.Rohit Gupta & Stephanie R. Morain - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (3):137-141.
Pases sanitarios para COVID-19.Gustavo Ortiz Millán - 2021 - Cuadernos Filosóficos / Segunda Época 18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references