Essay review: Why Can't Science Be More Like History: A Response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique [Book Review]

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 75:57-61 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The turn to affect: A critique.Ruth Leys - 2011 - Critical Inquiry 37 (3):434-472.
Like-Minded.Adam Frank & Elizabeth A. Wilson - 2012 - Critical Inquiry 38 (4):870-877.
ILike-Minded.Adam Frank & Elizabeth A. Wilson - 2012 - Critical Inquiry 38 (4):870-877.
Image and Trauma.Ruth Leys - 2006 - Science in Context 19 (1):137-149.
Moral Principles of Action.Wayne A. R. Leys & Ruth Nanda Anshen - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (1):127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-23

Downloads
15 (#971,366)

6 months
2 (#1,250,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references