“In Flow”! Why Do Users Share Fake News about Environmentally Friendly Brands on Social Media?

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (8) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Social media has triggered an increase in fake news spread about different aspects of modern lives, society, politics, societal changes, etc., and has also affected companies’ reputation and brands’ trust. Therefore, this paper is aimed at investigating why social media users share fake news about environmentally friendly brands. To examine social media users’ behavior towards environmentally friendly brands, a theoretical research model proposed and analyzed using structural equations modeling in SmartPLS on a convenience sample consisting of 922 questionnaires. Data was collected by means of a quantitative-based approach via a survey conducted among social media users from an emerging market. The results show that social media flow has a mediated impact on sharing fake news about environmentally friendly brands on social media. Considering the critical consequences of fake news, the paper argues that understanding the dissemination process of this type of bogus content on social media platforms has important theoretical and managerial implications. Understanding the psychological mechanisms that influence people’s behavior in sharing fake news about environmentally friendly brands on social networking sites (SNS) could help in better understanding the factors and the effects of this phenomenon. The originality of this research consists of proposing flow theory from positive psychology to be used as a theoretical framework to explain users’ behavior of sharing fake news about environmentally friendly brands on social media.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sharing Fake News about Brands on Social Media: a New Conceptual Model Based on Flow Theory.Rareș Obadă - 2019 - Argumentum. Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric 17 (2):144-166.
Proposing a model of social media user interaction with fake news.Abhijeet R. Shirsat, Angel F. González & Judith J. May - 2022 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 20 (1):134-149.
What is fake news?Romy Jaster & David Lanius - 2018 - Versus 2 (127):207-227.
What is fake news?M. R. X. Dentith - 2018 - University of Bucharest Review (2):24-34.
Fake News: A Definition.Axel Gelfert - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (1):84-117.
Fake news. A continuation or rejection of the traditional news paradigm?Marek Palczewski - 2017 - Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica 43 (5):23-34.
Pragmatist Media Ethics and the Challenges of Fake News.Scott R. Stroud - 2019 - Journal of Media Ethics 34 (4):178-192.
Fake News and Partisan Epistemology.Regina Rini - 2017 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (S2):43-64.
Free Speech and the Legal Prohibition of Fake News.Étienne Brown - 2023 - Social Theory and Practice 49 (1):29-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-17

Downloads
151 (#125,508)

6 months
56 (#82,632)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel-Rareș Obadă
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi

References found in this work

A theory of human motivation.A. H. Maslow - 1943 - Psychological Review 50 (4):370-396.
Flow.S. Abuhamdeh, J. Nakamura & M. Csikszentmihalyi - 1990 - In Andrew J. Elliot & Carol S. Dweck (eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation. The Guilford Press. pp. 598--608.

Add more references