The evolutionarily mismatched nature of modern group makeup and the proposed application of such knowledge on promoting unity among members during times of intergroup conflict

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many modern-day groups differ from prehistoric ones regarding the proportion of members who are related to any particular individual. From an evolutionary mismatch lens, an appreciation of this disparity could help better explain the potential dilution of group cohesion during peacetime and inform novel, more effective approaches to enhancing group unity – strategies that might enhance national security around the globe.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A simulation model of intergroup conflict.Holmes Miller & Kurt J. Engemann - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):355-367.
Group agency and supervenience.Philip Pettit - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):85-105.
Anxiety and Knowledge.Phil Jenkins - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):113-124.
Anxiety and Knowledge.Phil Jenkins - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):113-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-14

Downloads
6 (#1,481,650)

6 months
3 (#1,042,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans.R. I. M. Dunbar - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (4):681-694.

Add more references