Enthymemathical Proofs and Canonical Proofs in Euclid’s Plane Geometry

In Hassan Tahiri (ed.), The Philosophers and Mathematics: Festschrift for Roshdi Rashed. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 127-144 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the application of Postulate I.2 in Euclid’s Elements is not uniform, one could wonder in what way should it be applied in Euclid’s plane geometry. Besides legitimizing questions like this from the perspective of a philosophy of mathematical practice, we sketch a general perspective of conceptual analysis of mathematical texts, which involves an extended notion of mathematical theory as system of authorizations, and an audience-dependent notion of proof.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Proofs, pictures, and Euclid.John Mumma - 2010 - Synthese 175 (2):255 - 287.
Combinatorial analysis of proofs in projective and affine geometry.Jan von Plato - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (2):144-161.
Ternary operations as primitive notions for plane geometry II.Victor Pambuccian - 1992 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 38 (1):345-348.
The Euclidean Mousetrap.Jason M. Costanzo - 2008 - Idealistic Studies 38 (3):209-220.
A formal system for euclid’s elements.Jeremy Avigad, Edward Dean & John Mumma - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (4):700--768.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
8 (#1,318,140)

6 months
4 (#790,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marco Panza
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references