Hume's Argument against Miracles

In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 44–48 (2011-09-16)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Hume's Fallacy.K. Rao - 1981 - Journal of Parapsychology 45.
Miracles.George N. Schlesinger - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 398–404.
Belief in miracles: Tillotson's argument against transubstantiation as a model for Hume. [REVIEW]Michael Levine - 1988 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 23 (3):125 - 160.
A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Richard Otte - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (1):165-168.
Mackie's treatment of miracles.Richard Otte - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 39 (3):151-158.
Hume and Religious Miracles.Gregory L. Bock - 2011 - Philosophia Christi 13 (1):165-168.
Bayesian Analyses of Hume’s Argument Concerning Miracles.Michael Levine - 1997 - Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):101-106.
The credibility of miracles.Ruth Weintraub - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (3):359 - 375.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
9 (#1,236,107)

6 months
6 (#510,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references