Nature and Culture Dualism: Genesis of an Obsolete Dichotomy

Philosophy Study 3 (9) (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper will discuss the relation between the concepts of nature and culture and their intricate interdependency, focusing on modernity. Moreover, it will analyze the dichotomy that has historically emerged and its implications. Human beings have had different conceptions about what is natural and what is non-natural throughout their history. Before Modernity we did not conceive nature as being a different ontological reality, we did not perceive it as being separated from us. After modernity everything changed, and we began to see nature as a mere object. Nature became, then, a representation, like a painting on a wall. Our contemporary world vision, Weltanschauung, was formed mainly during the 16th and 17th centuries. There was, at that time, a considerable change in the way we perceived and described the world. This new mentality and this new form of representing the cosmos provided the basis for our new way of thinking. They were the substrate upon which our modern paradigm was erected. The world’s conversion in an image only became a reality thanks to technology. But this change happened only because of the paradigm shift originated in the 17th century. Technique always has been a way to articulate how we think. With the Greek, technique was, at first, an extension of the physis. Thus, the technique was a way of being instead of a way of thinking. After the paradigm shift in the 17th century, the human being left his former place. Perhaps would be even better if we talked about nature and culture as being as a hybrid. What, at the source, was natural, through the flows of production and consumption, undergoes transformations and becomes something that is not natural anymore but, at the same time, not completely artificial either. Our world, once divided between the social and the natural, becomes a space where a constant process, a continuous flow, is constantly happening. From that dichotomy between something good and something bad arises a dialectic, in which we no longer can see any division whatsoever.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond Nature and Culture.Janet Lloyd (ed.) - 2014 - University of Chicago Press.
Beyond Nature and Culture.Janet Lloyd (ed.) - 2013 - University of Chicago Press.
Nature and Culture as Human Spaces.Thomas Storck - 2015 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 8 (1):1-16.
Nature and Culture In Environmental Ethics.Iii Holmes Rolston - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:151-158.
Nature Naturalized.Paul Veatch Moriarty - 2007 - Environmental Ethics 29 (3):227-246.
The Forms of Life: Complexity, History, and Actuality.Tom Cheetham - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (4):293-311.
Nature and Culture In Environmental Ethics.Holmes Rolston - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:151-158.
The forms of life: Complexity, history, and actuality.Tom Cheetham - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (4):293-311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-07

Downloads
85 (#202,335)

6 months
27 (#114,203)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references