Use of Forensic DNA Evidence in Prosecutors' Offices

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):310-315 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

DNA evidence has rapidly become a significant and routine feature of modern criminal prosecutions. The first introduction of DNA evidence in a U.S. Court occurred in 1987. By 1994, 42 percent of local prosecutors reported that they had used DNA evidence in a felony case at least once. By 2001 that number had increased to 68 percent. Moreover, from a technical point of view, the potential benefits of DNA testing are substantial. Early hurdles to admissibility during trial have been overcome by the adoption of rigorous standards for DNA analysis. Rapid development of identification technology, fueled in significant part by the Human Genome Project, and the resultant development and expansion of national forensic DNA databases, has increased the potential of DNA to play a major role in crime solving. Indeed, over three million offender profiles, collected by state and federal authorities, now reside in the National DNA Index System. This number is likely to increase as more states and the federal government are expanding compelled DNA collections to individuals arrested for certain crimes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Use of Forensic DNA Evidence in Prosecutors' Offices.Jeffrey M. Prottas & Alice A. Noble - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):310-315.
Forensic expertise and judicial practice: evidence or proof?Aleksandar Apostolov - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (6):1147-1150.
Feminist Prosecutors and Patriarchal States.Kit Kinports - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (3):529-542.
Si fa jian ding de su song hua.Yuhua Li - 2006 - Beijing Shi: Zhongguo ren min gong an da xue chu ban she. Edited by Junsheng Yang.
Perversion and forensic science: fraudulent testimonies.Renata Salecl - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (3):887-906.
Should or should not forensic psychiatrists think about free will?Gerben Meynen - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (2):203-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
31 (#516,123)

6 months
18 (#141,157)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Forensic Science.Paul C. Giannelli - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (3):535-544.
Forensic Science.Paul C. Giannelli - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (3):535-544.

Add more references