Miscarriage of jstice

Criminal Law News 105:02-28 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Expert2 evidence is admissible only if it provides the court with scientific information likely to be outside the experience and knowledge of a judge or jury. In other words, expert evidence will be restricted to that which in the opinion of the court is necessary to assist the court to resolve the proceedings.3 This particular case must be urgently considered by the Criminal Appeals Review Commission as it becomes apparent that the court of appeal decision is flawed, not surprising when one considers the mountain of miscarriages of justice in the United Kingdom criminal justice system.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analysis of R v H 2014.Sally Ramage - 2017 - Criminal Law News 105:02-26.
Genetics crime and justice, Edward elgar 2015.Sally Ramage - 2016 - Current Criminal Law 9 (3):2-29.
Participatory Democracy and Criminal Justice.Albert W. Dzur - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):115-129.
jasper's Kangaroo Court Of International Injustice: A Response.Eric Smaw - 2003 - Florida Philosophical Review 3 (2):45-61.
In support of fraud trials without a jury.Sally Serena Ramage - 2005 - The Criminal Lawyer 156 (156):1-176.
Actions, causes, and psychiatry: a reply to Szasz.I. M. Brassington - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):120-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-29

Downloads
714 (#23,753)

6 months
99 (#47,692)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sally Serena Ramage
University of Wolverhampton (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references