Questioning the Goal of Same-Sex Marriage

Australian Feminist Studies 72 (27):205-219 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The prominent call to legalise same-sex marriage in Australia raises questions concerning whether its achievement will result in amplified societal acceptance of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people, and on what grounds this acceptance will take place. Same-sex marriage may not challenge heteronormative and patriarchal features typically associated with marriage, and may serve to reinforce a hierarchy that promotes traditional marriage as the ideal relationship structure. This may result in only assimilationist acceptance of LGBT people. However, the consequence of inclusion to marriage ought to reflect social acceptance of LGBTs as people worthy of equal treatment in dignity and in rights, regardless of perceived differences or similarities to a supposed majority standard. This article argues that justice would be best served by introducing and promoting a variety of State-sanctioned unions whilst simultaneously introducing same-sex marriage. This ‘pluralisation strategy’ would increase awareness and legitimacy of other relationship-recognition options, promoting respectful acceptance of LGBT and heterosexual people alike.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against Marriage and Motherhood.Claudia Card - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (3):1 - 23.
Brief Refutations of Some Common Arguments against Same-Sex Marriage.Benjamin A. Gorman - 2004 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Issues 4 (1):13-15.
Same-Sex Marriage and Equality.Reginald Williams - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):589-595.
Marriage Rights and LGBTQ Youth: The Present and Future Impact of Sexuality Policy Changes.Michelle A. Marzullo & Gilbert Herdt - 2011 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 39 (4):526-552.
Why the Teleology of Marriage Matters to Law.Mark J. Boone - 2015 - The Evangelical Philosophical Society's Web Project for Philosophical Discussions of Marriage and Family Topics.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-06

Downloads
33 (#484,501)

6 months
6 (#520,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Louise Richardson-Self
University of Tasmania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references