Farnell's Pindar The Works of Pindar translated, with Literary and Critical Commentaries. By Lewis Richard Farnell. Vol. I. Translation in Rhythmical Prose with Literary Comments. Pp. xii + 383; 12 illustrations. London: Macmillan, 1930. 18s
The Classical Review 45 (04):136-137 (1931)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesD. S. Robertson (1932). The Works of Pindar Translated The Works of Pindar Translated, with Literary and Critical Commentaries. By Lewis Richard Farnell. Vol. II.: Critical Commentary. Pp. Xxx + 489. Vol. III.: The Text. Pp. Viii + 184. London: Macmillan, 1932. Cloth, 30s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (05):205-208.
A. Berriedale Keith (1910). Farnell's Cults of the Greek States The Cults of the Greek States. By L. R. Farnell, D. Litt. Vol. V. Pp. Xii+496, with 19 Collotypes and 41 Other Illustrations. Price 18s. 6d. Net. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1909. [REVIEW] The Classical Quarterly 4 (04):282-.
Lewis R. Farnell (1933). Pindar: A Reply. The Classical Review 47 (01):9-11.
Douglas E. Gerber (1988). Commentaries on Pindar W. J. Verdenius: Commentaries on Pindar, Vol. 1: Olympian Odes 3, 7, 12, 14. (Mnemosyne, Suppl. 97.) Pp. Xii+132. Leiden: Brill, 1987. Paper, Fl. 54. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (02):203-205.
Lewis R. Farnell (1915). Pindar, Athens and Thebes: Pyth. IX. 151–170. The Classical Quarterly 9 (04):193-.
H. J. Rose (1922). Outline-History of Greek Religion. By Lewis Richard Farnell. One Vol. 185 × 125 Mm. Pp. 91. London: Duckworth and Co., 1920. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (7-8):192-.
Lewis R. Farnell (1931). Note by Dr. L. R. Farnell. The Classical Quarterly 25 (3-4):162-.
W. M. L. Hutchinson (1917). The Odes of Pindar The Odes of Pindar, Including the Principal Fragments. With an Introduction and an English Translation by Sir John Sandys (Loeb Classical Series). London: William Heinemann; New York: The Macmillan Company, 1915. 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 31 (3-4):98-100.
Christopher Carey (1990). Commentary on Pindar W. J. Verdenius: Commentaries on Pindar, Vol. II: Olympian Odes 1, 10, 11, Nemean 11, Isthmian 2. (Mnemosyne Suppl. 101.) Pp. Xi + 154. Leiden, New York, Copenhagen and Cologne: Brill, 1988. Paper, Fl. 62. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (02):216-217.
D. S. Robertson (1928). Pindar's Pythian Odes Pindar: Pythian Odes. Translated by H. T. Wade-Gery and C. M. Bowra. Pp. Xlv + 165. London: The Nonesuch Press, 1928. 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (05):177-178.
J. E. Sandys (1891). Buray's Nemeax Odes of Pindar The Nemean Odes of Pindar, Edited with Introductions and Commentary, by J. B. Bury, M.A, Fellow of Trinity College, Dublin. London; Macmillan and Co. 1890. 12s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (07):305-308.
M. M. Willcock (1971). Pindar Translated Carl A. P. Ruck and William H. Matheson: Pindar, Selected Odes. Pp. 269. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1968. Cloth, £3·75. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 21 (01):13-15.
S. L. Greenslade (1970). Augustine: City of God. With an English Translation. Vol. Iii (Books Vii–Xi): Translated by David S. Wiesen. Vol. Iv (Books Xii–Xv): Translated by Philip Levine. (Loeb Classical Library.) Pp. Xii+571; X+581. London: Heinemann, 1968, 1966. Cloth, 25s. Net Each. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 20 (01):102-103.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-12-06Total downloads1 ( #275,053 of 549,700 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
