Toward Relativization of Psychophysical "Relativity"
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perceptual and Motor Skills 42:843-850 (1976)
A paradoxical feature of Weber's law is considered. The law presumably states a principle of psychophysical relativity, yet a pre-relativistic physical measurement model has been traditionally employed. Classical physics, Einsteinian relativity, and a newer interpretation of the relativity concept are discussed. Their relation to psychophysics is examined. The domain wherein Weber's law breaks down is noted as suggestively similar to that in which physicists report relativistic effects. A tentative hypothesis is offered to stimulate further thought about a more meaningful integration of psychophysics with modern physical science
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Laszlo E. Szabo (forthcoming). Lorentzian Theories Vs. Einsteinian Special Relativity - a Logico-Empiricist Reconstruction. In A. Maté, M. Rédei & F. Stadler (eds.), Vienna Circle and Hungary -- Veröffentlichungen des Instituts Wiener Kreis. Springer.
Rolf Schock (1981). The Inconsistency of the Theory of Relativity. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 12 (2):285-296.
Harald Nordenson (1969). Relativity, Time and Reality: A Critical Investigation of the Einstein Theory of Relativity From a Logical Point of View. London, Allen & Unwin.
Roland Sypel & Harvey R. Brown (1992). When is a Physical Theory Relativistic? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:507 - 514.
Mario Bacelar Valente, Did the Concepts of Space and Time Change That Much with the 1905 Theory of Relativity?
R. K. Pathria (1963). The Theory of Relativity. Delhi, Hindustan Pub. Corp..
Roger Jones (1980). Is General Relativity Generally Relativistic? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 381.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-07-16
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?