Ordinal analyses for monotone and cofinal transfinite inductions

Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (3-4):277-291 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider two variants of transfinite induction, one with monotonicity assumption on the predicate and one with the induction hypothesis only for cofinally many below. The latter can be seen as a transfinite analogue of the successor induction, while the usual transfinite induction is that of cumulative induction. We calculate the supremum of ordinals along which these schemata for \ formulae are provable in \. It is shown to be larger than the proof-theoretic ordinal \ by power of base 2. We also show a similar result for the structural transfinite induction, defined with fundamental sequences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intuitionistically provable recursive well-orderings.Harvey M. Friedman & Andre Scedrov - 1986 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 30 (2):165-171.
Variation on a theme of Schutte.D. Probst & G. Jager - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (3):258.
Fast-Collapsing Theories.Samuel A. Alexander - 2013 - Studia Logica (1):1-21.
Intuitionistic sets and ordinals.Paul Taylor - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (3):705-744.
Transfinite induction within Peano arithmetic.Richard Sommer - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 76 (3):231-289.
Epsilon substitution for transfinite induction.Henry Towsner - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (4):397-412.
The proof-theoretic analysis of Σ11 transfinite dependent choice.Christian Rüede - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 122 (1-3):195-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-17

Downloads
32 (#494,786)

6 months
12 (#207,528)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?