Alive and Kicking: The Greatly Exaggerated Death of Nuclear Deterrence

Ethics and International Affairs 15 (1):71-77 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite the radical changes in the global political and military situation in the past ten years, U.S. nuclear forces retain the same mission and the same basic structure they had when Moscow was the seat of the “Evil Empire.” As it has for decades, the United States maintains thousands of nuclear warheads on a variety of land-, sea- and air-based platforms. These forces are on a level of high alert, ready to launch within minutes of an attack warning. It is a distinctly Cold War footing in a world that has long since come in from the cold of U.S.–Soviet antagonism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons.Steven P. Lee - 1993 - Cambridge University Press.
Morality and Paradoxical Deterrence.Steven Lee - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (1):136.
An Examination of a Moral Argument against Nuclear Deterrence.Robert McKim - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):279 - 297.
Reason and Nuclear Deterrence.Alan Gewirth - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (sup1):129-159.
On Defense by Nuclear Deterrence.Jan Narveson - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (sup1):195-211.
Disarming nuclear apologists.Robert E. Goodin - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):153 – 176.
Ethics and nuclear deterrence.Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.) - 1982 - New York: St. Martin's Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-26

Downloads
12 (#1,088,071)

6 months
3 (#981,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references