Frankenberry's critique and the recovery of the early Wieman

American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 13 (2):105 - 116 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assessing Wieman's contribution: The theistic stance without the supernatural God.Marvin C. Shaw - 1999 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 20 (3):241 - 257.
The source of human good.Henry Nelson Wieman - 1946 - Edwardsville,: Southern Illinois Univ. Press.
Recovery and epistemic residue.Sven Ove Hansson - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (4):421-428.
The growth of religion.Henry Nelson Wieman - 1938 - Chicago,: Willett, Clark. Edited by Walter Marshall Horton.
Belief contraction without recovery.Sven Ove Hansson - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):251 - 260.
Dewey's critique of Kant.James Scott Johnston - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (4):518-551.
On the logic of theory change: Contraction without recovery. [REVIEW]Eduardo L. Fermé - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (2):127-137.
Recovery From Natural and Man-Made Disasters As Capabilities Restoration and Enhancement.C. Murphy & P. Gardoni - 2008 - International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 3 (4):1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-17

Downloads
5 (#1,534,828)

6 months
3 (#961,692)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references