The Vocalism of Sino-Tibetan

Journal of the American Oriental Society 61 (1):18 (1941)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/594341

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Vocalism of Sino-Tibetan.Robert Shafer - 1940 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 60 (3):302-337.
The Initials of Sino-Tibetan.Robert Shafer - 1950 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 70 (2):96-103.
Problems in Sino-Tibetan Phonetics.Robert Shafer - 1944 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 64 (3):137-143.
Sino-Tibetan: Inspection of a ConspectusSino-Tibetan, a Conspectus.Roy Andrew Miller, Paul K. Benedict & James A. Matisoff - 1974 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 94 (2):195.
Vokalismus – Raná podoba nominalismu.Marek Otisk - 2008 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 15 (3):304-322.
Sino-Tibetan: Another Look.Paul K. Benedict - 1976 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 96 (2):167-197.
Sino-Tibetan Languages.Randy J. LaPolla - 2005 - In Alex Barber (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier. pp. 393--397.
Sino-Tibetan 'Iron': *Qhleks.Kun Chang - 1972 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 92 (3):436-446.
Sino-Tibetan Relations in the Seventeenth Century.Turrell V. Wylie & Zahiruddin Ahmad - 1973 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 93 (3):409.
The Tibetan Assimilation of Buddhism: Conversion, Contestation, and Memory.Matthew T. Kapstein - 2002 - Oup Usa.
Contributions to Sino-Tibetan Studies.Stephen W. Durrant, John McCoy & Timothy Light - 1989 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 109 (3):487.
Tibetan Philosophy.Nicolas Bommarito - 2010 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Many Canons of Tibetan Buddhism: Piats 2000: Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the Ninth Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Leiden 2000 by Helmut Eimer; David Germano. [REVIEW]S. J. - 2005 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 125 (2):341-342.
What is Debate for? The Rationality of Tibetan Debates and the Role of Humor.Georges B. Dreyfus - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (1):43-58.
Tibet and Imperial China; A Survey of Sino-Tibetan Relations up to the End of the Manchu Dynasty in 1912.E. H. S., Josef Kolmaš & Josef Kolmas - 1968 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 88 (2):365.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-07

Downloads
15 (#941,877)

6 months
5 (#625,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references