Abstract

The article explores the specifics of the separation of political gnoseology, political epistemology and political cognition as directions of penetration of the subject of knowledge into the essence of political phenomena and processes at the methodological level. It is emphasized that the classical and non-classical theory of cognition has paved the way for a modern scientific understanding of experimental methodology and generally accepted standards of scientific novelty. The attention is focused on the formation of one-dimensional political views on political cognition as a reflective reflection of the political world in a certain period of time by the actual means of cognition. It is emphasized that the question of the significance of the classical directions of cognition, mono-ideological and monodoctrynnyh structures of political world perception is actualized. It is argued that in the conditions of informatization and the growth of the importance of machine intelligence systems in the practice of obtaining new knowledge, it is necessary to find out the problem of the value of artificial intelligence and non-human systems of thinking for political knowledge of the future. It is substantiated that the scientific paradigm of thinking defines standard requirements for the effectiveness and efficiency of political activity. Considered the importance of part of political knowledge, which may not meet the criteria of natural or technical scientific.