Maya Cosmology and Philosophy of Science
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Part of our fascination with the Maya can be attributed to the fact that they were literate . . . that is, the Classic Maya possessed a visible language that consisted of letters and a grammar, and one of the products of their literacy was the book. (Aveni 1992b, p.3).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Douglas L. Berger (2004). The Veil of Māyā: Schopenhauer's System and Early Indian Thought. Global Academic Pub..
Donald A. Braue (1984). Māyā in Radhakrishnanʼs Thought: Six Meanings Other Than Illusion. Motilal Banarsidass.
Donald R. Tuck (1986). The Concept of Māyā in Śaṃkara and Radhakrishnan. Chanakya Publications.
L. Thomas O'Neil (1980). Māyā in Śaṅkara: Measuring the Immeasurable. Motilal Banarsidass.
Ruth Reyna (1962). The Concept of Māyā From the Vedas to the 20th Century. Bombay, New York, Asia Pub. House.
Paul David Devanandan (1950). The Concept of Māyā. London, Lutterworth Press.
Hugh Taft-Morales (2002). Maya's Philosophy. Questions: Philosophy for Young People 2:9-9.
Teun Goudriaan (1978). Māyā Divine and Human: A Study of Magic and its Religious Foundations in Sanskrit Texts, with Particular Attention to a Fragment on Viṣṇu's Māyā Preserved in Bali. Motilal Banarsidass.
Madhavtirtha (1943). Maya, its Spiritual Exposition Based on the Theory of Relativity. Chhota-Udaipur, East Gujarat, Swami Swayamjyoti Tirtha, Introd..
John Major Jenkins (1994). Jaloj Kexoj and Phi-64: The Dual Principle Core Paradigm of Mayan Time Philosophy and its Conceptual Parallel in Old World Thought. Four Ahau Press.
Aditi De (1982). The Development of the Concept of Maya and Avidya with Special Reference to the Concept of Vivarta: An Interpretation of Sankara Philosophy. De.
Nr̥siṃhacaraṇa Paṇḍā (1991). Māyā in Physics. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Maya Bar-Hillel & Avishai Margalit (1972). Newcomb's Paradox Revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (4):295-304.
Maya J. Goldenberg (2010). From Popperian Science to Normal Science. Commentary on Sestini (2010). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):306-310.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads6 ( #155,026 of 740,143 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?