How Does Philosophical Counseling Work?

International Journal of Philosophical Practice 1 (2):58-67 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hume claims that judgment is the active device through which beliefs influence emotions. Without such a device, Hume reasons that beliefs and emotions would not in­teract at all, because beliefs are always about ideas while emotions are reactions to events in the world. Judgment is the link between the theoretical and the applied aspects of the human being, and is, if Hume is right, crucial for any system of philosophical counseling to be successful. No client would attempt to modify his or her beliefs, or reflect on the thoughts of philosophers, without some expectation of an emotional payoff. The counseling process hinges on a link between reason and the emotions, but what is the nature of this link? Since judgment is itself (if we are lucky) a primarily rational process, the question of the connection between reason and the emotions seems to be left unanswered. The purpose of this paper is to examine the link between reason and the emotions by taking judgment to be judgment of truth or falsity. Once a belief is deemed to be true by the client, an assessment is made as to how this truth will affect the client’s well being. I argue that this is true even if the client is severely depressed or believes that he/she does not deserve good treatment or good fortune, or seems otherwise unconcerned with his/her well being. If the truth is judged to be a threat to the well being of the client, an emotional reaction ensues. Likewise, if the truth is judged to be a benefit to the client, an emotional reaction will occur. I argue further that even though different truths will be taken as either benefits or threats depending on the client, the ultimate interpretation of the true statement as either benefit or threat will automatically generate an emotional response. If this ontology is correct, then the philosophical counselor will take as his/her primary role 1) a practitioner of epistemology (determining when beliefs are justified and true) and 2) a trainer in interpretation (determining when beliefs are to be interpreted as blessings or threats.)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Counseling.Sara Waller - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (2):23-31.
Responsibility for Beliefs and Emotions.Miriam McCormick & Michael Schleifer - 2006 - Paideusis: Journal of the Canadian Philosophy of Education Society 15 (1):75-85.
Rationality, emotion, and belief revision: Waller's move beyond CBT & REBT.William Angelett - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Practice 1 (3):16-33.
Challenges to an Emerging Profession.Samuel Zinaich - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Practice 1 (4):14-22.
Emotional Truth.Ronald de Sousa - 2011 - Oxford University Press USA.
Janet Staab on Philosophical Coaching as Engaged Pedagogy.Samuel Zinaich - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Practice 2 (4):27-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-20

Downloads
4 (#1,642,306)

6 months
3 (#1,046,148)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references