David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 34 (3):243-250 (1967)
The axiom of comparability has been a fundamental part of mathematical choice theory from its beginnings. This axiom was a natural first assumption for a theory of choice originally constructed to explain decision making where other assumptions such as continuous divisibility of choice spaces could legitimately also be made. Once the generality of application of formal choice theory becomes apparent, it also becomes apparent that both continuity assumptions and the axiom of comparability may be unduly restrictive and lead to the neglect of decision situations which are important and which can be handled on a modified axiom set. These considerations bear on the philosophical analysis of the concept of rational decision
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
G. P. Monro (1983). On Generic Extensions Without the Axiom of Choice. Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (1):39-52.
John L. Bell, The Axiom of Choice. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mitchell Spector (1988). Ultrapowers Without the Axiom of Choice. Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1208-1219.
Lorenz Halbeisen & Saharon Shelah (2001). Relations Between Some Cardinals in the Absence of the Axiom of Choice. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):237-261.
Paul E. Howard (1973). Limitations on the Fraenkel-Mostowski Method of Independence Proofs. Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (3):416-422.
Edward F. McClennen (1990). Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations. Cambridge University Press.
M. Carmen Sánchez (1998). Rational Choice on Non-Finite Sets by Means of Expansion-Contraction Axioms. Theory and Decision 45 (1):1-17.
Paul Howard & Jean E. Rubin (1995). The Axiom of Choice for Well-Ordered Families and for Families of Well- Orderable Sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (4):1115-1117.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #104,157 of 1,102,926 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #183,068 of 1,102,926 )
How can I increase my downloads?