The work of remorse : Vladimir Jankélévitch's conception of the ethical subject and François Ozon's Frantz

In Marguerite La Caze & Magdalena Żółkoś (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Vladimir Jankélévitch: On What Cannot Be Touched. Lanham: Lexington Books (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Jankélévitch's metaphysics of humility.Andrew Kelley - 2019 - In Marguerite La Caze & Magdalena Żółkoś (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Vladimir Jankélévitch: On What Cannot Be Touched. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Tragic-remorse–the anguish of dirty hands.Stephen De Wijze - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):453-471.
Remorse and Criminal Justice.Susan A. Bandes - 2016 - Emotion Review 8 (1):14-19.
Why Should Remorse be a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing?Steven Keith Tudor - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):241-257.
The Bad Conscience.Andrew Kelley (ed.) - 2014 - University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-03

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references