Remorse and Criminal Justice: Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives

Routledge (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This multidisciplinary collection brings together original contributions to present the best of current thinking about the nature and place of remorse in the context of criminal justice. Despite the wide-spread and long-standing nature of interest in offender remorse, the topic has until recently been peripheral in academic studies. The authors are scholars from North America, the UK, Europe, South Africa and Australia, from diverse academic disciplines. They reflect on the role of remorse in law, for better or for worse, on how expressions of remorse are affected by the legal contexts in which they arise, and on the impact of these expressions on the individual, the court, and the community. The work is divided into four parts - Part I Judging Remorse addresses issues concerning the task of assessing remorse in the courtroom, usually prior to determining sentence. Part II Remorse Beyond the Courtroom explores the place and significance of remorse in various post-court settings. Part III Remorse, War and Social Trauma addresses remorse in the context of political violence and social trauma in the former Yugoslavia and South Africa. Finally, Part IV Reflections seeks to underscore the multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary nature of the collection as a whole, through personal and disciplinary reflections on remorse. The work provides a showcase for how diverse academic disciplines can be brought together through a focus on a common topic. As such, the collection will become a standard reference work for further research across a range of disciplines and promote inter-disciplinary dialogue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Remorse and Criminal Justice.Susan A. Bandes - 2016 - Emotion Review 8 (1):14-19.
Why Should Remorse be a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing?Steven Keith Tudor - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):241-257.
Remorse, Reform and the Real World: Reply to Lippke. [REVIEW]Steven Tudor - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):269-272.
Criminal punishment and restorative justice: past, present, and future perspectives.David J. Cornwell - 2006 - Portland, Or.: North American distributor, International Specialised Book Services. Edited by F. W. M. McElrea, John R. Blad & Robert B. Cormier.
Review essay / Dominion as the target of criminal justice.C. L. Ten - 1991 - Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (2):40-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-21

Downloads
17 (#865,183)

6 months
9 (#302,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references